skip to Main Content

write 300-450 characters for each topic please~ 1. We have had occasion to use a

write 300-450 characters for each topic please~ 1. We have had occasion to use abductive reasoning to characterize a number of arguments. Explain the criteria for evaluating abductive inference and explain the way in which abductive reasoning is used in the following cases: 1, Paley’s argument from design and the evolutionary alternative 2, evil demon skepticism about the external world 3, dualism vs identity theory. In each case, evaluate the strength of the abductive inference and be sure to consider what role, if any, auxiliary assumptions play in each case.To what extent do these abductive arguments help redolve the issues at stake in each case? 2. what is the main argument for skepticism about the external world? Explain the reasons for thinking that each of the premises of this argument for skepticism are plausible. Which response(if any): Descartes’ or Nozick’s or the Skeptic’s do you find the most plausible, and why?(first be sure to explain what each of these responses says )

DO YOU NEED HELP WITH THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER? CLICK HERE TO GET HELP FROM EXPERTS

Back To Top